Would NO housing on the Park make the proposal acceptable?

Stephen McIntyre · Post by **Stephen McIntyre** » 26 Mar 2006, 14:51

Would you be inclined to accomodate the schools on Portobello Park if a way could be found to finance the proposal without housing?

Dadaist · Post by **Dadaist** » 26 Mar 2006, 14:54

Maybe have an option for housing on different parks instead of just Portobello park - like Rosefield, Brighton and also the bowling green at the library.

Epykat · Post by **Epykat** » 26 Mar 2006, 15:18

Dadaist wrote:Maybe have an option for housing on different parks instead of just Portobello park - like Rosefield, Brighton and also the bowling green at the library.

I'm with you there Dada

(I think your question is a wee bit confusing Porty. By 'Park' do you mean the playing fields or the whole area (inc golfie)?)

Stephen McIntyre · Post by **Stephen McIntyre** » 26 Mar 2006, 15:26

Sorry, I mean the whole area of Portobello Park.

Libby · Post by **Libby** » 10 Apr 2006, 04:29

Hello Excuse me, would you all then support all the other people who live in the areas where the Houses would be Put.

I see Now, we will take the School but the Houses NIMBY

Picture more Clearer Now

Libby

Epykat · Post by **Epykat** » 10 Apr 2006, 10:31

By putting the school on the Park and the houses elsewhere in the area it would mean the 'burden' would be shared more equally throughout the Community instead of one area copping the lot - in my opinion.

Bob Jefferson · Post by **Bob Jefferson** » 10 Apr 2006, 12:47

Do it to Jewel-ia! Do it to Jewel-ia!

Dave Connelly · Post by **Dave Connelly** » 10 Apr 2006, 21:20

Bob Jefferson wrote:Do it to Jewel-ia! Do it to Jewel-ia!

I agree. Do it there. Its going to be built on sooner or later anyway

, make it now. Edina could use Portobello park

Talk Porty ~ Portobello

Would NO housing on the Park make the proposal acceptable?

Would you support School but no Housing on Prtobello Park?

Would NO housing on the Park make the proposal acceptable?

And