Smoking Ban

General discussion - "gossip and tittle tattle"
Post Reply
foxy
Posts: 2055
Joined: 05 Nov 2004, 09:04
Location: wherever I lay my hat

Smoking Ban

Post by foxy » 11 Nov 2004, 16:30

A brave and fine "devolved" decision at last

User avatar
CatzVP
Posts: 999
Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 06:13
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by CatzVP » 11 Nov 2004, 16:36

What is?? :?
Is Man The Dream Of The Dolphin??

foxy
Posts: 2055
Joined: 05 Nov 2004, 09:04
Location: wherever I lay my hat

Post by foxy » 11 Nov 2004, 16:38

The Scottish Smoking Ban announced yesterday

Anyone would think you lived abroad :lol:

User avatar
DG
Posts: 778
Joined: 26 Mar 2004, 21:42
Location: Portobello
Contact:

Post by DG » 11 Nov 2004, 16:40

Yeh, I agree with this one. I welcome the ban but wonder how it will be administered.

Wondered if we could have a POL poll on this one - those for and against? There have been so many recent statistical quotes that don't seem quite accurate being bantered about - like the one I heard on the radio this morning that 'Around 70% of Scots oppose the ban' :?: :?

DG

User avatar
wangi
[admin]
Posts: 3442
Joined: 27 May 2004, 10:37
Contact:

Post by wangi » 11 Nov 2004, 16:53

I ken, it's like the police don't have enough to police already...

User avatar
CatzVP
Posts: 999
Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 06:13
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by CatzVP » 11 Nov 2004, 19:51

Ontario has had it banned in Pubs and food establishments (public places) for a while now... next is banning smoking in cars which should be in the next month or two (going through the vote now) ......then it will be you will pay through the roof for house insurance if your a smoker, to stop you smoking in your own home..... its going overboard taking the smokers right away in their own home.... and this is coming from a non smoker
Is Man The Dream Of The Dolphin??

User avatar
Pal of Porty
Posts: 2136
Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
Location: Old Folks Home
Contact:

Post by Pal of Porty » 11 Nov 2004, 20:07

wangi wrote:I ken, it's like the police don't have enough to police already...
This will not be enforced by the Police. The Scottish Exec do not have devolved powers to change the Health and Safety at Work Act (the way they it did in Ireland). So they are tackling it under a Public Health issue where they do have powers. It will be monitored by Environmental Enforcers rather like he way the parking meanies work. 8)
Justice delayed is justice denied.

User avatar
Epykat
Posts: 3915
Joined: 04 Dec 2003, 22:35
Location: Portobello, Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by Epykat » 12 Nov 2004, 15:08

What I don't understand is why can't they say "no smoking in pubs etc from next January" - why do we have to wait until 2006??? Are they hoping the smokers will have had time to give it up then there'll be less opposition?
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!

ifstar
Posts: 154
Joined: 19 Jun 2004, 22:17
Location: Near the police station

Post by ifstar » 13 Nov 2004, 13:25

I think thats the deadline for when it has to be done but the venue can choose to inforce it before then if they wish.

User avatar
Porty
Posts: 8514
Joined: 08 Jun 2004, 14:30
Location: Organic Market

Post by Porty » 13 Nov 2004, 14:44

Epykat wrote:What I don't understand is why can't they say "no smoking in pubs etc from next January" - why do we have to wait until 2006??? Are they hoping the smokers will have had time to give it up then there'll be less opposition?
Its mainly because the decision on the venue for the 2012 Olympics will not be taken until July 2005.
.....ambition makes you look pretty ugly

User avatar
Epykat
Posts: 3915
Joined: 04 Dec 2003, 22:35
Location: Portobello, Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by Epykat » 13 Nov 2004, 20:38

[quote="Porty]
Its mainly because the decision on the venue for the 2012 Olympics will not be taken until July 2005.[/quote]

What? They're not thinking of holding the whole Olypic Games in a pub are they? :shock:

(I can hear FIREWORKS as I'm typing!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: )
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!

User avatar
Pal of Porty
Posts: 2136
Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
Location: Old Folks Home
Contact:

Post by Pal of Porty » 30 Jun 2005, 22:56

Yahoo. The smoking ban was passed as law by Parliament earlier today. Roll on March 2006! :clock:
Justice delayed is justice denied.

ecm
Posts: 3053
Joined: 15 Jun 2003, 11:34

Post by ecm » 30 Jun 2005, 22:59

Pal of Porty wrote:Yahoo. The smoking ban was passed as law by Parliament earlier today. Roll on March 2006! :clock:

Oh bugger! :evil:

User avatar
Porty
Posts: 8514
Joined: 08 Jun 2004, 14:30
Location: Organic Market

Post by Porty » 30 Jun 2005, 23:00

Hip Hip Hooray :D :D :D

User avatar
Robin!
Posts: 428
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 21:56
Location: Portobello
Contact:

Post by Robin! » 30 Jun 2005, 23:08

I'm looking forward to going down the pub without breathing in smoke and stinking of it! Cant wait! :D
Visit me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Robinho08
Visit Porty on Bebo: http://www.bebo.com/portobellopunters
Sponsor me:
http://www.justgiving.com/robinho08

User avatar
Epykat
Posts: 3915
Joined: 04 Dec 2003, 22:35
Location: Portobello, Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by Epykat » 01 Jul 2005, 14:25

Hooray :P It's a bit of a wait though - will still have to avoid the Dalriada/Temple
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!

User avatar
Novastar
Posts: 232
Joined: 24 May 2005, 14:49
Location: The Forresters on a Friday night
Contact:

Post by Novastar » 01 Jul 2005, 16:17

Good - apart for the pubs (Irish pubs have had a serious loss in takings since their ban) - I'll still visit mine though.

Just seems stupid for the reasons given for the ban. Ban it because it's digusting, smells, hurts the smokers health and is addictive. Don't bring in unproven 'science' about passive smoking - there has never been a non-sponsered report that has proven a 100% link despite what half the parliment has been shouting about for the last x months.

Seems to me they were trying to push it at non-smokers to make them against it and bolster public opinion.

Sorry - rant over :wink:

Post Reply