General discussion - "gossip and tittle tattle"
-
xxxx
- Posts: 332
- Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 14:03
Post
by xxxx » 14 Oct 2005, 17:04
Porty wrote:Thanks Paul so no individual could pull it?
I could kill it, redirect it if I wanted, but as I don't consider it to be my property, I wouldn't.
You'd have the same potential problem with any individual named as the contact with nominet and they do require a named individual, not just an organisation.
-
Porty
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: 08 Jun 2004, 14:30
- Location: Organic Market
Post
by Porty » 14 Oct 2005, 17:08
xxxx wrote:Porty wrote:Thanks Paul so no individual could pull it?
I could kill it, redirect it if I wanted, but as I don't consider it to be my property, I wouldn't.
You'd have the same potential problem with any individual named as the contact with nominet and they do require a named individual, not just an organisation.
Fair enough. I was concerned that now we are taking money off third parties,for a year's service, in the name of the community council , we should ensure that we can deliver that service.
-
xxxx
- Posts: 332
- Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 14:03
Post
by xxxx » 14 Oct 2005, 17:25
Porty wrote:Dadaist wrote:Porty wrote:Thanks Paul so no individual could pull it?
There's also the question of who pays the hosting bill, and who owns/wrote the site and any custom modifications to it.
Sorry, I deleted my posts as I thought the questions had been addressed.
What are the implications of those other things, dada?
The hosting will be paid by the POL subcommittee, I think bob's paid upfront and is reimbursed, no individuals are claiming ownership of the site or parts thereof, and I won't claim any rights to anything I contribute.
-
Porty
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: 08 Jun 2004, 14:30
- Location: Organic Market
Post
by Porty » 15 Oct 2005, 10:04
Fair enough.