British Summer Time
British Summer Time
Personally I can't wait, it always cheers me up as the end of March approaches and the oppositye applies at the end of October.
Many of you probably know that in the US this year they are trying an experiment. Their clocks moved forward two weekends ago, they are adding three weeks on a the beginning of summer time amd one week at the end. It is thought that this adjustment will save energy, road accidents and fatalities.
Even if it doesn't I would be more than happy to back such a move here.
Many of you probably know that in the US this year they are trying an experiment. Their clocks moved forward two weekends ago, they are adding three weeks on a the beginning of summer time amd one week at the end. It is thought that this adjustment will save energy, road accidents and fatalities.
Even if it doesn't I would be more than happy to back such a move here.
They did! One year they decided not to change the clocks, but it didn't work well, so it was back to changing them the next year.Epykat wrote:Did they not try something different when we were at Primary? Remember us all going about in the pitch dark til about 10am with fluorescent armbands on
Can't remember exactly what year it was though!
Why be scared????
The form of governmental tampering has generally been the institution of Summer Time, advancing the legal time by one hour during the summer months in order to promote greater efficiency in the use of the daylight hours and of artificial lighting; originally introduced as a wartime measure in 1916, this has been continued through peacetime as well, with occasional variations such as double summer time (advancing the clocks by a second hour for part of the summer) in World War 2—the government files on which in the Public Record Office (now National Archives) having, when the closure period was first set (probably late 1960s), been deemed so sensitive as to merit a closure period of 100 years—and the experiment with British Standard Time from 1968 to 1972, by which the time was advanced by one hour from GMT throughout the year. In addition, the precise start and end dates and times for Summer Time have been the subject of a great many individual orders detailed below. Adjusting the clocks has been an extremely effective way of really changing the times at which most people work (as measured on a uniform time scale), while giving the misleading impression that they are not changing the times at which they work, but rather an act of government has changed the times at which the sun rises and sets. (In February 2000 I requested a review of the extended closure period of the World War 2 summer time records, and in May the Home Office concluded that they could now be opened to the public.)
Every so often, someone tries again to institute the keeping in the UK of a time one hour ahead of GMT in winter, and two hours ahead in summer. Apart from arguments concerning notional convenience in dealing with Europe, the arguments for this seek lighter evenings (say, after work), the arguments against lighter mornings (say, for children going to school); and either side may quote statistics on accident rates that suit its cause. My personal view is that we should do away with the twice annual changing of clocks and maintain UTC as legal time for the whole year. Those people wishing for lighter evenings could arrange with their employers to start and finish work earlier—with changes in working practices, this type of arrangement becomes increasingly practicable—without causing everyone’s hours to change as they would by default under a change of the legal time. People for whom dark mornings would be a problem need not go to earlier hours. It would be appropriate for governments to try to generally encourage changes in hours where those changes have benefits in the particular circumstances, for example through tax incentives for seasonally varying opening hours, for flexible arrangements allowing hours chosen by the individual, or more directly for energy efficiency; and if needed a greater degree of coercion could be applied in wartime. I would consider the value of the honesty of being clear that the aim is to change working times, rather than hiding it behind changes of clocks, to out-weigh the advantages that may arise from such changes.
The strongest argument for doing away with Summer Time might however be that it could help deal with certain misconceptions that changes to the clocks can create “extra daylight”. Some years ago this idea came up in a Private Member’s Bill, the British Time (Extra Daylight) Bill of 1995–6 introduced by John Butterfill MP. While this attempt failed, it appeared that the idea that politicians could create extra daylight by legislating for it was unfortunately widespread.
Every so often, someone tries again to institute the keeping in the UK of a time one hour ahead of GMT in winter, and two hours ahead in summer. Apart from arguments concerning notional convenience in dealing with Europe, the arguments for this seek lighter evenings (say, after work), the arguments against lighter mornings (say, for children going to school); and either side may quote statistics on accident rates that suit its cause. My personal view is that we should do away with the twice annual changing of clocks and maintain UTC as legal time for the whole year. Those people wishing for lighter evenings could arrange with their employers to start and finish work earlier—with changes in working practices, this type of arrangement becomes increasingly practicable—without causing everyone’s hours to change as they would by default under a change of the legal time. People for whom dark mornings would be a problem need not go to earlier hours. It would be appropriate for governments to try to generally encourage changes in hours where those changes have benefits in the particular circumstances, for example through tax incentives for seasonally varying opening hours, for flexible arrangements allowing hours chosen by the individual, or more directly for energy efficiency; and if needed a greater degree of coercion could be applied in wartime. I would consider the value of the honesty of being clear that the aim is to change working times, rather than hiding it behind changes of clocks, to out-weigh the advantages that may arise from such changes.
The strongest argument for doing away with Summer Time might however be that it could help deal with certain misconceptions that changes to the clocks can create “extra daylight”. Some years ago this idea came up in a Private Member’s Bill, the British Time (Extra Daylight) Bill of 1995–6 introduced by John Butterfill MP. While this attempt failed, it appeared that the idea that politicians could create extra daylight by legislating for it was unfortunately widespread.
- SoupDragon
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02
Very informative Porty.
Can remember going to school with the armbands on ,68-72 according to your dates, though I thought it was only one year, but I was young and other things were more important
I hate getting used to the time change, wish they'd just leave it as is.
Have heard arguments about us and Europe all being in one time zone but the USA manages with different time zones so why can't we?
Can remember going to school with the armbands on ,68-72 according to your dates, though I thought it was only one year, but I was young and other things were more important
I hate getting used to the time change, wish they'd just leave it as is.
Have heard arguments about us and Europe all being in one time zone but the USA manages with different time zones so why can't we?
Spelling errors (or lack thereofali wrote:What was it that made you suspicious?Poppy wrote:Where did you copy that from, Porty?![]()
![]()
![]()
Hmmm!!(In February 2000 I requested a review of the extended closure period of the World War 2 summer time records, and in May the Home Office concluded that they could now be opened to the public.)
Poppy wrote:Spelling errors (or lack thereofali wrote:What was it that made you suspicious?Poppy wrote:Where did you copy that from, Porty?![]()
![]()
![]()
) and general style. And especially
Hmmm!!(In February 2000 I requested a review of the extended closure period of the World War 2 summer time records, and in May the Home Office concluded that they could now be opened to the public.)
"Hmmm" right enough.
I know, BC! Awful, isn't it? See that Marya and Bellybabe? We'll get them back for this....one day!!bearcub wrote:That was my 1st thought......followed closely by "Damn, I'm a Mod now, I've got to read the whole thing"Poppy wrote:Where did you copy that from, Porty?
I dread Youtube links...although I do like Bob's latest link re "Joppa - A Sea View".
Just taking the proverbial!! Here's the full text. Something to do with that hotbed of spies known as Cambridge 'Uni' or, worse, 'Vaaaasitty'Porty wrote:Whoah not claiming that's mine. I googled "British Summer Time History" and it came top. Don't know who wrote it? Sorry for keeping you all in the dark.
- mr magnolia
- Posts: 972
- Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 22:07
- Location: close to the edge
- Contact:
I sped ( a rare experience) across the great motorway network of Scotland after work today and arrived in Portobello just after 7pm, in what I would call the first gloaming of the year. It was a wonderful evening.
I only associate the gloaming with summertime - it needs to last a measurable time; it needs to be warm(ish) and you need to hear birdsong. Oh, and someone must be roaming. Perhaps you also need to be measured in BST too, but this one snuck in early.
I only associate the gloaming with summertime - it needs to last a measurable time; it needs to be warm(ish) and you need to hear birdsong. Oh, and someone must be roaming. Perhaps you also need to be measured in BST too, but this one snuck in early.
Every Day Counts
- SoupDragon
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02
- SoupDragon
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: 03 Oct 2006, 11:02