Should we be thinking about street parties and/or a community whip round for the happy couple?
Charlie Boy and Cammy
Charlie Boy and Cammy
With the announcement of the marriage of our Future King to Mrs Parker-Bowls, what's your thoughts?
Should we be thinking about street parties and/or a community whip round for the happy couple?
Should we be thinking about street parties and/or a community whip round for the happy couple?
Re: Cahrlie Boy and Cammy
NO WAYGemini wrote:With the announcement of the marriage of our Future King to Mrs Parker-Bowls, what's your thoughts?
Should we be thinking about street parties and/or a community whip round for the happy couple?
You are joking aren't you
How old would you be, if you didn't know how old you are?
Cahrlie is my darling?
It doesn't sound quite the same. Can you fix it please Gemini.
Yep, i would be up for a street party. If it coincides with the wedding all good and well. But I think I may be in benidorm that weeksnd.
Yep, i would be up for a street party. If it coincides with the wedding all good and well. But I think I may be in benidorm that weeksnd.
Last edited by Porty on 15 Feb 2005, 12:01, edited 1 time in total.
I'm not a big monarchy fan but I've been quite horrified by some of the appallingly inflammatory press coverage of this whole thing. Headlines such as "What would Diana think?" strike me as being in very poor taste as well as being totally irrelevant. It was okay for her to have her affair with James Hewitt, and nobody minded her relationship with Dodi, but God forbid Charles should do the same. They got divorced, and she died. Surely the man is allowed to get on with his life just like anyone else would be, and just like she was? Apparently not.
If everyone's so anti-monarchy these days anyway, why do they care so much about one man's love for a woman who happens to be less pretty and apparently charming than his first wife? The rest of us have a right to be happy. I can't see myself why Charles and Camilla don't.
As for the arguments about it being unacceptable for monarchy, if we're still living in the dark ages then he could just have had Di's head chopped off like Henry VIII...unless we're living in the 21st century, in which case divorce happens, remarriage happens, and why should it matter that much to us?
If everyone's so anti-monarchy these days anyway, why do they care so much about one man's love for a woman who happens to be less pretty and apparently charming than his first wife? The rest of us have a right to be happy. I can't see myself why Charles and Camilla don't.
As for the arguments about it being unacceptable for monarchy, if we're still living in the dark ages then he could just have had Di's head chopped off like Henry VIII...unless we're living in the 21st century, in which case divorce happens, remarriage happens, and why should it matter that much to us?
All I really need is love, but a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt!
-Lucy Van Pelt (in Peanuts, by Charles M. Schulz)
-Lucy Van Pelt (in Peanuts, by Charles M. Schulz)
I agree with you BB. People have affairs, get divorced, remarry, die, go to the loo, have their tea etc, etc, etc every day so I don't see what all the fuss is about. The likelihood of Charles ever being King are slim anway. The Queen will live to be 120 like her mother, she'll never abdicate and by the time she does go he'll be about 85! And as Ed says, maybe we'll get a day off 
Oh! And at least my husband bought me my own engagement ring and didn't give me his Granny's!! (cheapskate)
Oh! And at least my husband bought me my own engagement ring and didn't give me his Granny's!! (cheapskate)
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!
- Pal of Porty
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
- Location: Old Folks Home
- Contact:
All the stuff being written about Charlie has largely been brought on by himself. If he have had the backbone to marry Camilla in the first place then he could have been a lot happier.
While we are living in an age where divorce etc is more prevalent, sleeping with your mistress from the night before your wedding onwards, hardly smacks of commitment to make a relationship work.
However I hope they get married, live happly ever after and emigrate to a distant corner.
While we are living in an age where divorce etc is more prevalent, sleeping with your mistress from the night before your wedding onwards, hardly smacks of commitment to make a relationship work.
However I hope they get married, live happly ever after and emigrate to a distant corner.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
- Pal of Porty
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
- Location: Old Folks Home
- Contact:
Yes, I believe she did only offer to pay for a finger buffet! I was just thinking - wouldn't it be funny if Prince Rainier's funeral was on Saturday?Poppy wrote:I would dam n well hope so as she's the one forking out the dosh for the tea and sarnies!!they would have kept her a doggy bag.
Enough of your nonsense - get back to the Play Pen!
- Pal of Porty
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 30 Sep 2004, 13:41
- Location: Old Folks Home
- Contact: